Based on one of Stephen King’s stories and directed by Mike Flanagan, the film also brings in familiar faces from his regular troupe like Kate Siegel, Rahul Kohli and Carl Lumbly.
For me, the first act was the best part. It felt mysterious and magical, like you don’t totally get what’s happening but you’re hooked anyway. The small details, the wonder, that’s when the film really hit me.
But after that, I felt like something was missing. The later parts didn’t fully land for me emotionally and I kept waiting for that same spark from the beginning to come back. It’s still a really unique and soulful movie, just not as powerful all the way through.
What I did like though is how the film doesn’t treat Chuck like some chosen one or a hero. He’s just a regular guy, an accountant who lived, laughed, danced a little and then died.
Also, the way the film shifts tones is kind of wild. One moment you’re watching a quiet scene that feels like indie drama, then suddenly you’re hit with this apocalyptic vibe, crumbling skies, weirdly cheerful music. It’s messy in spots, but that’s what makes it stand out.
In the end, The Life of Chuck is one of those films that makes you think about how fragile life is and how even the end can feel like a thank you.